mediaconsumption | Author Index | About Us | Book Reviews | Music Reviews | Email | Punk Encyclopedia | Punk Links | Writers

Sobriquet

mediaconsumption Home
Sobriquet Home
About the Main Blog
About the Zine
Record Reviews
Ed Kemp
D.O.T.S.T.
Sobriquet on Facebook
Sobriquet on MySpace
Sobriquet on Twitter

News

Reuters
New York Times
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Newark Star-Ledger
Chicago Tribune
Minneapolis Star-Tribune
St. Paul Pioneer Press
Washington Post
Los Angeles Times
San Francisco Chronicle
Christian Science Monitor
San Jose Mercury News
Boston Globe
Dallas Morning News
Miami Herald
Houston Chronicle
Chicago Sun-Times
Denver Post
Detroit Free Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Detroit News
Baltimore Sun
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sacramento Bee
Kansas City Star
Orlando Sentinel
Seattle Times
St. Petersburg Times
Indianapolis Star
Boston Herald
Tampa Tribune
Orange County Register
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Hartford Courant
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Columbus Dispatch
Louisville Courier-Dispatch
The Oklahoman
Norfolk Virginian-Pilot
Los Angeles Daily News
Philipine Star
Omaha World-Herald
Richmond Times-Dispatch
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Philadelphia Inquirer
Arizona Republic
San Antonio Express-News
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
American Reporter
Portland Oregonian
Charlotte Observer
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Terre Haute Tribune-Star
Sacramento Union
Washington Times
The National Ledger
Anchorage Daily News
Charleston Gazette
Ashland Daily Tidings
The Daily Star

Powered by Blogger

eXTReMe Tracker
Fuck a Duck!

Wednesday, March 26, 2008
From the Guardian:

"The strange case of the homosexual necrophiliac duck pushed out the boundaries of knowledge in a rather improbable way when it was recorded by Dutch researcher Kees Moeliker."

"Ducks behave pretty badly, it seems. It is not so much that up to one in 10 of mallard couples are homosexual - no one would raise an eyebrow in the liberal Netherlands - but they regularly indulge in 'attempted rape flights' when they pursue other ducks with a view to forcible mating. 'Rape is a normal reproductive strategy in mallards,' explains Mr Moeliker."

"As he recounts in his seminal paper, 'The first case of homosexual necrophilia in the mallard anas platyrhynchos,' he was in his office in the Natuurmuseum Rotterdam, when he was alerted by a bang to the fact a bird had crashed into the glass facade of the building. 'I went downstairs immediately to see if the window was damaged, and saw a drake mallard (anas platyrhynchos) lying motionless on its belly in the sand, two metres outside the facade. The unfortunate duck apparently had hit the building in full flight at a height of about three metres from the ground. Next to the obviously dead duck, another male mallard (in full adult plumage without any visible traces of moult) was present. He forcibly picked into the back, the base of the bill and mostly into the back of the head of the dead mallard for about two minutes, then mounted the corpse and started to copulate, with great force, almost continuously picking the side of the head.'"
[Full Story]

Labels: ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
News Briefs

Tuesday, March 18, 2008
From The Guardian:
"Primary school children should be eligible for the DNA database if they exhibit behaviour indicating they may become criminals in later life, according to Britain's most senior police forensics expert."
[Full story]

Well, England did produce 1984 and Brave New World...

From Reuters:
"The thickest, oldest and toughest sea ice around the North Pole is melting, a bad sign for the future of the Arctic ice cap, NASA satellite data showed on Tuesday."
[Full story]

More evidence of global warming to share with your doubting friends, if you're so inclined.

Labels: , , , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
The FCC Might Let You Be

From The Washington Post:
"The Supreme Court announced yesterday that it will rule on the government's standards for policing the public airwaves for the first time since the court agreed 30 years ago that a midday radio broadcast of comedian George Carlin's 'seven dirty words' monologue was indecent."
[Full story]

In an era when parental vetting of television programming has become more and more common, when the V-chip and the ratings guides have become the norm, it seems to me that the Supreme Court should loosen the restrictions it places on the language broadcasters may use on air. There has always been the concern that children may be exposed to various words and images their parents deem "inappropriate" and, I suspect, any softening of the FCC's regulations will likely draw criticism from some of the more socially conservative demographics traditionally concerned with such content but, really, it is high time to lighten up. If parents don't want their children exposed to a particular type of content, it is their responsibility to weed it out. After all, no one has to buy a television.

Labels: , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
On Obamarama

The New York Times's William Kristol argues "there's something creepy" about "Generation Obama":

"The more you learn about him, the more Obama seems to be a conventionally opportunistic politician, impressively smart and disciplined, who has put together a good political career and a terrific presidential campaign. But there's not much audacity of hope there. There's the calculation of ambition, and the construction of artifice, mixed in with a dash of deceit -- all covered over with the great conceit that this campaign, and this candidate, are different."
[Full article]

Last week, in an entry on Sobriquet Magazine's main blog, we posted the following editorial comments:

I am astonished by the overwhelming outpouring of support among my 18-35 year-old peers for Barack Obama's presidential candidacy. I should emphasize that I am not particularly concerned with the possibility that Mr. Obama will become the next president of the United States, as I am sure he will be about as effective a leader as any of the current candidates. What concerns me, however, is the blind acceptance with which so many young people seem to embrace Obama's message. Bearing a message of hope as consistently vague as it is enthusiastic, Obama seems to have channeled the spirit of Beatlemania as effectively as any politician. Now, messages of hope and progress have always drawn the enthusiasm of socially-concerned, altruistic idealists--as should be the case--but the unquestioning enthusiasm with which Obama's brand of political optimism has been accepted suggests that the widespread dissatisfaction many Americans feel towards the Bush-Cheney era has weakened the healthy skepticism with which we normally scrutinize political rhetoric to a point when unremarkable statements dressed in decidedly eloquent, powerful oratory are welcomed as both novel and genuinely profound. Again, I am not saying that Mr. Obama's upbeat message is anything but a positive thing, but I hesitate to dismiss his lack of political experience, his inconsistent legislative record, or his astonishing self-importance (three traits many candidates share) as irrelevant to an evaluation of his candidacy as so many people seem to do. Therein lies the problem: Mr. Obama is as glib, as charming, as eloquent as any politician ought to be but we've lost our skepticism as a nation. In our haste to usher out what many perceive as a shamefully bleak era in American history, we have suppressed our skeptical nature, the hallmark of critical thinking and that is the problem with Barak Obama's candidacy. He has channeled the zeitgeist of a dissatisfied nation into an infectiously electric frenzy and very few commentators seem comfortable questioning whether such a splenetic mass mentality is healthy. If Mr. Obama wins the Democratic nomination, I suspect we will see some of these issues raised in the media and I suspect they will be spun as part of a conservative agenda, but they are not meant to favor the John McCain ticket or even a Hillary Clinton-headed Democratic slate. What I fear is reactionary fervor, blind acceptance as the result of sheer disdain, and a moment in our history when we lose an opportunity to reflect upon the consequences of jumping on a jingoistic bandwagon in the wake of a horrible tragedy by simply jumping on another bandwagon after the first one crashes.

Labels: , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
Music Industry Seeks 'Piracy Tax'

Monday, March 17, 2008
From Wired.com:

"In recent months, some of the major labels have warmed to a pitch by Jim Griffin...to seek an extra fee on broadband connections and to use the money to compensate rights holders for music that's shared online...Griffin's idea is to collect a fee from internet service providers -- something like $5 per user per month -- and put it into a pool that would be used to compensate songwriters, performers, publishers and music labels. A collecting agency would divvy up the money according to artists' popularity on P2P sites, just as ASCAP and BMI pay songwriters for broadcasts and live performances of their work."
[Full story]

Like most people, I share Mr. Griffin's concern for musicians and other creative artists receiving financial recompense for their work. However, his "pitch" strikes me as an extraordinarily bad idea. Ostensibly, as internet users, we would not be punished for our misdeeds in such a scenario. Instead, ISPs will be charged a few dollars each month for not preventing us from downloading music (and, I would assume, other media) illegally. Now ISPs, as money-making enterprises, would have to find a way to minimize the fiscal blow such a fee would entail. So far, so good. The next logical step, of course, would be for the ISPs in question to increase advertising rates and/or our monthly subscription costs.

Assuming that ISPs pass at least some of the monthly charges onto internet users via increased subscription rates, I would imagine that we will see several different reactions among consumers, including: A) people who dismiss the fee as "nominal"; B) people who, having spent money downloading music through iTunes and similar services, will resent paying "extra" for music they have already purchased; C) people who will view the charge as license to download music with impunity; and D) people who have no interest in downloading music and feel "punished" for the behavior of total strangers, folks who feel adding such a fee would almost be like asking someone buying a blank audio cassette to record his or her newborn's first words to pay extra for someone dubbing a Sheila E. record.

There is the very real possibility that people falling into groups B and D would respond to added fees by canceling their internet service (an admittedly unlikely scenario) or, at the very least, ceasing to purchase music (and other media) through established, legitimate channels. Whether or not such concerns will affect the choices record companies make regarding the dissemination of music and the payment of royalties, a surcharge will undoubtedly alienate consumers already skeptical about the business practices of companies widely considered avaricious. The way I see it, quite a few people willingly pay a dollar or two for a song download through companies like iTunes or Amazon. I, for instance, often spend several times the proposed "piracy surcharge" each month purchasing legitimate downloads--and I know of many, many other people who do the same. That five dollar add-on, I suspect, will push many of us away from "legal" channels, thereby weakening the cash flow record companies currently enjoy.

Of course, I am not an economist. I do suspect, however, that if such a surcharge is universally adopted by ISPs, record companies would earn more money than if we all kept buying music. Otherwise, why would anyone want to risk angering consumers? I mean, seriously, if record companies really want to go in that direction, they had better be certain that five bucks per internet user per month will bring more revenue than all other modes of music distribution combined because, once the "pirate tax" is implemented, they can kiss all that other revenue goodbye. After all, who would willingly give money to someone taking it against our will?

Labels: , , , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
Tainted Love?

From Der Spiegel:

"At first sight they look like an ordinary couple, strolling through the park with their child and their dog. But when the two adults hug each other their physical similarities are unmistakable. They have the same pronounced nose, the same blue-green eyes, and the same thin lips. Patrick S. and Susan K. are brother and sister. They are an incestuous couple."

Dietmar Hipp asks "[m]ust consensual sex between close relatives be punished?"

The high court replies "yes."

This story raises an interesting question for liberty-minded people: if no one is hurt by such a situation (as seems to be the case with the couple in question), should the government have the right to decide the fate of two apparently happy people, regardless of how repugnant such a scenario may strike most folks?

Labels: , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
One Reason to Root for Western Kentucky

From the Associated Press via ESPN.com:
"North Carolina was the only school among the four No. 1 seeds in the NCAA men's tournament to graduate at least 50 percent of its players."

"Two of the No. 2 seeds, Tennessee and Texas, graduated only 33 percent of their players for the period studied. The other second seeds, Georgetown and Duke, had success rates of 82 percent and 67 percent, respectively."

"If the Final Four were determined academically, it would be Western Kentucky (100 percent graduation success), Butler (92 percent), Notre Dame (91 percent) and Purdue (91 percent). Xavier, a No. 3 seed, was close behind with a 90 percent success rate."
[Full story]

Labels: , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________

Ideas

Arts & Letters Daily
Stirrings Still
With A Book In Hand
Logos

Magazines

The Atlantic
Harper's
National Geographic
Reason
Skeptic

Add to Technorati Favorites

Add to Google

Site Visits:
This site was built by modifying a template designed by Maystar Designs. All text, unless otherwise noted, is copyright 2001-2009 by Sobriquet Magazine (ISSN 1930-1820). Sobriquet Magazine and the Sobriquet Magazine logo are registered trademarks of Sobriquet Magazine.