mediaconsumption | Author Index | About Us | Book Reviews | Music Reviews | Email | Punk Encyclopedia | Punk Links | Writers

Sobriquet

mediaconsumption Home
Sobriquet Home
About the Main Blog
About the Zine
Record Reviews
Ed Kemp

News

Reuters
New York Times
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Newark Star-Ledger
Chicago Tribune
Minneapolis Star-Tribune
St. Paul Pioneer Press
Washington Post
Los Angeles Times
San Francisco Chronicle
Christian Science Monitor
San Jose Mercury News
Boston Globe
Dallas Morning News
Miami Herald
Houston Chronicle
Chicago Sun-Times
Denver Post
Detroit Free Press
San Diego Union-Tribune
Detroit News
Baltimore Sun
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sacramento Bee
Kansas City Star
Orlando Sentinel
Seattle Times
St. Petersburg Times
Indianapolis Star
Boston Herald
Tampa Tribune
Orange County Register
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Hartford Courant
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Columbus Dispatch
Louisville Courier-Dispatch
The Oklahoman
Norfolk Virginian-Pilot
Los Angeles Daily News
Philipine Star
Omaha World-Herald
Richmond Times-Dispatch
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Philadelphia Inquirer
Arizona Republic
San Antonio Express-News
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
American Reporter
Portland Oregonian
Charlotte Observer
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Terre Haute Tribune-Star
Sacramento Union
Washington Times
The National Ledger
Anchorage Daily News
Charleston Gazette
Ashland Daily Tidings
The Daily Star

Powered by Blogger

eXTReMe Tracker
Don't Believe the Hype: Nader Did Not Cost Gore the Election

Thursday, June 19, 2008
SNL alum Tim Meadows, from an interview with Kam Williams:
KW: You've done tons of impressions. Are you working on Barack Obama?

TM: Yeah, I've been working on Barack Obama a little bit. I'm waiting for him to win. I'm not going to waste my time if he's going to lose.

KW: Are you supporting him?

TM: I'll support him if he wins. I won't support him if he loses. [Laughs] No, I don't support anybody. It's not my thing. And if I did, I wouldn't say who it was publicly. I'll give you a hint who I'm voting for in November. It rhymes with Seder.

KW: Oh, Ralph Nader. You don't worry about possibly wasting your vote?

TM: No, I sort of disagree with people who blame him for taking votes away from Gore in 2000. Gore still won the popular vote. Nader wasn't the reason why he lost the election. The Supreme Court cost him the election. Plus, you don't know that all those people who voted for Nader would've gone for Gore. I've met Ralph Nader and I like him. And I've met John McCain, and he's a great guy, too. I haven't met Barack, but I have met Oprah Winfrey. I would love to see some change, and whatever the country decides, I'm behind it.
Tim is correct: Nader did not cost Gore the election in 2000. Yes, Nader did get 97, 488 votes in Florida in the election and yes, George W. Bush beat Al Gore by an anemic 537 vote margin, but seven other presidential candidates received more than 537 votes in Florida, too:
Pat Buchanan (Reform) -- 17, 484 votes.
Harry Browne (Libertarian) -- 16, 415 votes.
John S. Hagelin (Natural Law) -- 2281 votes.
Monica Moorehead (Workers World) -- 1804 votes.
Howard Phillips (Constitution) -- 1371 votes.
David McReynolds (Socialist) -- 622 votes.
James E. Harris (Socialist Workers) -- 562 votes.
I doubt any of the 1000+ socialist votes would have gone for Bush. Had even half of those gone to Gore, he would have won. But no one makes that argument. Of course, Nader's detractors have always been eager to point out (without any real evidence), that many of the Green Party's votes would have gone to the Democrats had Nader not run in the millennial election. And, of course, some of Nader's many votes would have probably gone to Al Gore. What the anti-Nader crusaders (Michael Moore, Eric Alterman, Fat Mike, etc.) don't mention, however, is that many of Nader's votes would have gone to George Bush or another (or no) candidate. Interestingly, a recent AP poll provides the following food for thought:

In a three-way race, Barack Obama would pick up 47 percent of the vote, John McCain would get 43 percent and Ralph Nader would get 6 percent. But the real kicker is that "[i]f Nader, the independent, is not included, Obama's lead is 49 percent to 46 percent." So, if Nader were not in the race, the six percent of the vote the consumer advocate might expect to pick up would disperse as follows:
1% would not vote for either the Democrats or Republicans
3% would vote for the Republicans
2% would vote for the Democrats
In other words, the GOP would benefit from Nader's exclusion while the Democrats would suffer.

Interesting, huh? I suspect some of Nader's critics would suggest that many of the people who voted for Nader in 2000 did not vote for him in 2004 because they were voting anti-Bush, and that the same demographic would be hesitant to "give" the White House to a Republican again by voting for Nader in 2008. Still, is it possible that maybe the Democrats have been spreading propaganda because Al Gore lost the election and they needed a scapegoat? In a word, yes.

Labels: , , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
This Can't Be Good

Tuesday, June 10, 2008
From Stuff.co.nz:

"Jodie Foster split from her long-term lover because the actress was having an affair, it has been reported."


"Jodie Foster, the Oscar winning actress, has reportedly ended her long-term relationship with the movie producer Cydney Bernard - just months after coming out as her girlfriend."

From Yahoo News:

"Administrators of a Washington psychiatric hospital have asked a federal district judge to expand release privileges of would-be presidential assassin John Hinckley Jr., court records show...Last year, Hinckley's doctors said he was ready to spend more time away from the hospital but a judge found that hospital administrators had not proposed a structure to ensure such trips would be safe."

Labels: , , , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
Where're Bono and Angelina Jolie When You Really Need Them?

Monday, June 9, 2008
From the New York Times's Jeffrey Gettleman:

"Discrimination against albinos is a serious problem throughout sub-Saharan Africa, but recently in Tanzania it has taken a wicked twist: at least 19 albinos, including children, have been killed and mutilated in the past year, victims of what Tanzanian officials say is a growing criminal trade in albino body parts."

"[T]he killings go on. They have even spread to neighboring Kenya, where an albino woman was hacked to death in late May, with her eyes, tongue and breasts gouged out. Advocates for albinos have also said that witch doctors are selling albino skin in Congo."

"Police officials said the albino killings were worst in rural areas, where people tend to be less educated and more superstitious. They said that some fishermen even wove albino hairs in their nets because they believed they would catch more fish."

Labels: , , , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
Washington D.C. to Resemble East Berlin, Apartheid-Era Cape Town

From the New York Examiner:

"Under an executive order expected to be announced today, police Chief Cathy L. Lanier will have the authority to designate 'Neighborhood Safety Zones.' At least six officers will man cordons around those zones and demand identification from people coming in and out of them. Anyone who doesn't live there, work there or have 'legitimate reason' to be there will be sent away or face arrest, documents obtained by The Examiner show."

Um. . .this can't be a good idea. . .

Labels: , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
Can You Hear Me Now?

Sunday, June 8, 2008
From the AP, via CNN:

"Researchers secretly tracked the locations of 100,000 people outside the United States through their cell phone use and concluded that most people rarely stray more than a few miles from home."

"The first-of-its-kind study by Northeastern University raises privacy and ethical questions for its monitoring methods, which would be illegal in the United States."

The study evidentially sought to see how far the average person strays from home in a year.

Creepy.

Labels: , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
Well, Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer of Not?

From the New York Times:

"Last week, three prominent neurosurgeons told the CNN interviewer Larry King that they did not hold cellphones next to their ears. 'I think the safe practice,' said Dr. Keith Black, a surgeon at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, 'is to use an earpiece so you keep the microwave antenna away from your brain.'"

"Along with Senator Edward M. Kennedy's recent diagnosis of a glioma, a type of tumor that critics have long associated with cellphone use, the doctors' remarks have helped reignite a long-simmering debate about cellphones and cancer."

Some scary stuff here.

Labels: , , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________
Child Abuse May Alter Genes in Suicide Victims, Study Says

From McGill University's Public and Media Newsroom:

"A team of McGill University scientists has discovered important differences between the brains of suicide victims and so-called normal brains. Although the genetic sequence was identical in the suicide and non-suicide brains, there were differences in their epigenetic marking - a chemical coating influenced by environmental factors."

Labels: , , , , ,

Permanent Link
Copyright Sobriquet Magazine

Share: StumbleUpon Toolbar del.icio.us Add to Mixx! Digg!

____________________________________________

Ideas

Arts & Letters Daily
Stirrings Still
With A Book In Hand
Logos

Magazines

The Atlantic
Harper's
National Geographic
Reason
Skeptic

Add to Technorati Favorites

Add to Google

Site Visits:
This site was built by modifying a template designed by Maystar Designs. All text, unless otherwise noted, is copyright 2001-2008 by Sobriquet Magazine (ISSN 1930-1820).